• Infrequently Changing Strategy

Better Execution: Stick to Your Strategy? [Part 2]

2017-07-02T16:07:32-07:00

Summary of Suggested Rules:

  1. A strategy that changes too often puts initiatives and execution in disarray.
  2. A strategy that changes too infrequently becomes irrelevant. The targeted outcomes and their associated initiatives are relevant by chance rather than by design.
  3. Few organizations can change their strategy at the speed of change. Most strategies reside in binders and PowerPoint presentations. They are not easily altered, and rarely read.
  4. Organizations can translate their strategy into targeted outcomes. It allows the organization to modify these targeted outcomes and their associated initiatives at the speed of change. Execution stays relevant.
  5. Strategy as translated into targeted outcomes can exist at any level of an organization. Targeted outcomes are the object of successful execution. The above rules apply to execution at any level of an organization.
  • Infrequently Changing Strategy

Better Execution: Change Your Strategy? [Part 1]

2017-07-02T16:07:32-07:00

Rob May of BusinessPundit.com, poses a really interesting question in a Blog posting. ““Does Change Help Link Strategy and Execution?" He’s curious about how companies can improve the link between

Did You Just Volunteer for Some Work?

2017-07-02T16:07:32-07:00

We don’t generally think of corporations and government organizations as volunteer organizations, but stop and think about it. How much of where you allocate your own time is influenced by

The Disconnect between Strategy and Execution

2017-07-02T16:07:32-07:00

There is not enough focused effort to address the gap between strategy and execution. George Ambler's blog The Practice of Leadership, has found a great survey on the Disconnect between

Go to Top